Where UFO Reports Become Usable Evidence
UFO report databases and catalogues are best understood as finding aids, not proof engines. They collect witness reports, official case files, photographs, investigative notes, locations, dates and sometimes media, but most entries are still reports of something unidentified at the time of observation rather than confirmed extraordinary objects.
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The strongest public resources fall into three groups: civilian reporting databases such as NUFORC, MUFON and Enigma; archival catalogues such as UFOCAT, Project Blue Book and national archive collections; and official or semi-official UAP repositories such as France’s GEIPAN, the US National Archives UAP collections, AARO pages and NASA’s UAP material. Their value depends less on dramatic case counts than on metadata quality, duplicate handling, source transparency and access to original records.
Why UFO databases are useful, and why they are easy to misuse
A UFO or UAP database usually records an observation before it has been fully explained. That makes it valuable for research into reporting patterns, public perception, aviation safety, historical investigation and misidentification, but it also means the word “unidentified” should not be read as “alien”, “advanced technology” or even “physically anomalous”. NASA’s 2023 independent study stressed that many existing UAP reports do not by themselves constitute the kind of repeatable, reproducible data needed for strong scientific analysis, especially when sensor details, calibration information and multiple measurements are missing. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience Independent Study Team ReportUAP data are important information that should be available for researchers studying the observations. This is essential for a data- driv…
The distinction matters because many catalogues mix very different kinds of material: a pilot report with radar context, a short public web form, a decades-old newspaper clipping, a military document, a photograph of uncertain provenance, or a later summary written by a researcher. CUFOS describes UFOCAT, for example, primarily as a reference catalogue of published and unpublished reports, and notes that it can contain multiple entries for the same sighting because the same case may appear in an original file, periodical article and book account. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO StudiesUFOCATUFOCAT is a catalog of published and unpublished UFO sighting reports. It often contains multiple entries for…
Good databases therefore answer a modest but important question: “Where is the report, what does it say, and what was done with it?” Poor use of the same data jumps too quickly to: “How many real UFOs are there?” Large sighting counts can reflect population density, media attention, weather, reporting culture, aircraft traffic, satellite visibility, mobile-phone use or the design of the reporting form. A 2023 study using NUFORC data found that public UAP reports are associated with environmental and sky-viewing variables, while a 2022 study of more than 80,000 UFO reports found reporting behaviour can be sensitive to media broadcasting and time-of-day effects. [PMC]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govThis research uses data from the National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC) online. NUFORC was formed in 1974…Read more…
The main public reporting databases readers actually use
The most visible UFO databases are not government archives. They are public-facing reporting systems that let witnesses submit sightings and let readers browse recent or historical reports. Their strength is scale and immediacy; their weakness is uneven verification.
NUFORC — the National UFO Reporting Center — is one of the most widely used public UFO report databases. Its databank describes itself as the largest independently collected set of UFO/UAP sighting reports available on the internet, with reports open for public browsing through indexes. [NUFORC]nuforc.orgData Bank | NUFORCData Bank | NUFORC NUFORC is especially useful for date, location, shape and free-text witness descriptions, and it has become a common source for journalists, researchers and hobbyists analysing long-term sighting patterns. Academic work has used NUFORC data to study environmental factors and reporting behaviour, which shows its research value even when individual entries remain unverified. [PMC]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govThis research uses data from the National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC) online. NUFORC was formed in 1974…Read more…
MUFON — the Mutual UFO Network — combines public reporting with an investigator network. Its site presents real-time sighting tools, recent reports and pathways for becoming a field investigator. [MUFON]mufon.comOpen source on mufon.com. MUFON’s value is that some reports may be followed up by investigators, but public visibility can vary by case and by the level of detail released. For a reader comparing databases, MUFON is best treated as a large private reporting and investigation ecosystem rather than a neutral archive of all UFO claims.
| Enigma Labs is a newer mobile-first platform built around reporting, mapping, media and community analysis. Its public “Explore” page says it combines current reports with more than 270,000 sighting reports from publicly available sources, presenting itself as a large queryable historical database for global sightings. [Enigma Labs]enigmalabs.ioSource details in endnotes. | Report a UFO sighting Its distinctive feature is the attempt to integrate mobile capture, location context, metadata and deconfliction tools; a New Yorker profile described features aimed at identifying planes and satellites and recording video with embedded metadata such as location and filming angle. [The New Yorker]newyorker.comThe New Yorker The Truth Is Out There, on an AppThe New Yorker The Truth Is Out There, on an App The caution is that a polished interface does not automatically solve the old UFO-data problem: reports still need context, chain of custody, duplicate control and independent verification. |
Archival catalogues are slower but often stronger
For historical work, archives and catalogues usually matter more than live sighting feeds. They preserve the documents behind famous cases and allow readers to examine how investigators classified evidence at the time.
UFOCAT, maintained by the J. Allen Hynek Center for UFO Studies, is one of the key historical catalogues. Its purpose is not simply to count sightings but to point researchers towards sources on a case, including unpublished files, articles and book references. CUFOS explicitly warns that UFOCAT may have multiple entries for the same incident, which is a feature for source tracing but a problem for anyone trying to count unique events. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO StudiesUFOCATUFOCAT is a catalog of published and unpublished UFO sighting reports. It often contains multiple entries for…
Project Blue Book records remain central to US UFO history because Blue Book was the US Air Force’s longest-running UFO investigation, closing in 1969. The US National Archives states that Project Blue Book has been declassified, that records are available for examination, and that it has no information on sightings after the project closed. [National Archives]media.nationalarchives.gov.ukSource details in endnotes. For readers, Blue Book is not a modern reporting database; it is a historical government case-file collection. It is useful for reconstructing how mid-20th-century sightings were handled, but not for contemporary UAP trends.
The US National Archives UAP collections have become more important as digitised and born-digital UAP-related records have been gathered into catalogue pages and bulk downloads. The Archives provides bulk downloads for records related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena and separate pages for photographs and record-group collections. [National Archives]media.nationalarchives.gov.ukSource details in endnotes. [National Archives]media.nationalarchives.gov.ukSource details in endnotes. These resources are often less convenient than a popular UFO map, but they are more reliable for primary-source research because they link records to institutional provenance.
The UK National Archives UFO files are another major archival resource for official-document researchers. The Ministry of Defence UFO files released through the UK archive are useful for understanding how sightings were reported to and processed by government, but they should be read as administrative and historical records rather than a solved-case database. [media.nationalarchives.gov.uk]media.nationalarchives.gov.ukSource details in endnotes.
Official UAP repositories are changing the field
The term “UAP” has shifted some public attention from older civilian UFO databases to official reporting and transparency systems. These repositories are narrower than public sighting databases because they often focus on military, aviation, sensor or national-security reporting, but their metadata and investigative standards can be more consequential.
AARO, the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, is the US government office responsible for addressing UAP through a scientific and data-driven framework. Its public site includes areas for official imagery, case resolution reports, reporting trends, UAP records, congressional products and an electronic freedom-of-information reading room. [aaro.mil]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil. AARO’s annual reporting shows why catalogue counts need care: the FY2023 report said AARO had received 801 UAP reports as of 30 April 2023, while the FY2024 report covered 757 reports received during its reporting period, including both new incidents and earlier incidents not previously included. [aaro.mil]aaro.milUNCLASSIFIED FY23 Consolidated Annual Report on UAP Oct 25 2023 1236UNCLASSIFIED FY23 Consolidated Annual Report on UAP Oct 25 2023 1236
The US government’s recent UAP reporting has also made clear that many cases remain unresolved because data are incomplete, not because they have been shown to be extraordinary. The Department of Defense’s 2024 release said AARO received 757 reports during the period covered, while Associated Press reporting noted that many identified cases involved balloons, birds or satellites and that some unresolved cases lacked sufficient information. [U.S. Department of War]war.govdepartment of war releases unidentified anomalous phenomena files in historic tdepartment of war releases unidentified anomalous phenomena files in historic t(#endnote-16 “Endnote 16”) Reuters similarly reported that AARO’s historical review found no evidence of extraterrestrial technology and that many sightings were ordinary objects or phenomena, with better-quality data needed to resolve more cases. [Reuters]reuters.comPentagon UFO report says most sightings 'ordinary objects' and phenomenaPentagon UFO report says most sightings 'ordinary objects' and phenomena
NASA’s UAP study material is not a sighting catalogue in the same way as NUFORC or GEIPAN, but it is important because it reframes what a useful future database should contain. NASA announced its UAP study to identify available data, improve future collection and assess how NASA could use data to advance scientific understanding. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience Independent Study Team ReportUAP data are important information that should be available for researchers studying the observations. This is essential for a data- driv… The final study recommended that NASA use its open-source resources, technical expertise, data analysis methods, partnerships and Earth-observing assets to help curate a better dataset. [NASA]science.nasa.govScience Independent Study Team ReportUAP data are important information that should be available for researchers studying the observations. This is essential for a data- driv…
GEIPAN, within the French space agency CNES, is one of the strongest examples of an official public UAP case database. CNES says GEIPAN was created in 1977 and collects, analyses and archives information on unidentified aerospace phenomena while informing the public. [cnes.fr]cnes.frSource details in endnotes. GEIPAN’s own mission page describes its work as collecting, analysing, investigating, publishing and archiving UAP sighting reports. [cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr. For readers, GEIPAN is especially valuable because it pairs official status with public case classification, although critical reassessments of French official UFO studies have argued that some past cases and methods have had serious weaknesses. [skepticalinquirer.org]skepticalinquirer.orgSource details in endnotes.
How the major databases differ
ResourceBest useMain strengthMain cautionNUFORCBrowsing and analysing public witness reportsLarge, accessible, long-running civilian report databaseReports are self-submitted and vary in detail and reliabilityMUFONFollowing public reports and private investigation activityInvestigator network and recent-report toolsPublic access and case detail can be unevenEnigma LabsMobile reporting, mapping and broad exploratory browsingModern interface, media handling and large combined datasetCommunity and app-based reports still require independent verificationUFOCATHistorical source tracingPoints to multiple sources for the same caseDuplicate entries make simple counting riskyProject Blue Book / NARAUS historical official case filesPrimary government records and declassified materialEnds in 1969 and does not cover modern sightingsGEIPANOfficial French UAP case reviewPublic official investigations and classificationsNational scope and classification methods need careful readingAAROCurrent US official UAP reporting trends and releasesNational-security-facing official repositoryPublic releases may omit classified detail and can lack full sensor contextNASA UAP materialStandards for future scientific dataStrong guidance on data quality and scientific methodNot itself a comprehensive sighting database
The practical takeaway is that no single database is “the” UFO catalogue. A reader checking a famous case should start with archival or official records where available, then use civilian databases to compare public reporting. A reader studying patterns should use large datasets such as NUFORC or Enigma, but should control for population, weather, media attention and duplicates. A reader asking whether a case is extraordinary should look for original documents, sensor metadata, multiple independent observations and later explanations, not just a database entry.
What separates a useful catalogue from a weak one
The best UFO databases do not merely collect dramatic stories. They preserve context. A high-value entry should ideally include the date, time zone, duration, location, observer position, direction of view, angular size, weather, nearby airports, satellite passes, aircraft traffic, astronomical objects, photographs or video with metadata, investigator notes, classification history and links to source documents. NASA’s study highlighted the importance of sensor characteristics and metadata, because without them analysts cannot reliably test whether a sighting was a known natural or technological phenomenon. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience Independent Study Team ReportUAP data are important information that should be available for researchers studying the observations. This is essential for a data- driv…
Weak catalogues usually fail in predictable ways. They merge rumours with reports, do not flag duplicates, strip out provenance, present “unexplained” as “unexplainable”, or count every entry as a separate event. They may also over-weight memorable cases while ignoring the many reports later attributable to aircraft, balloons, satellites, meteors, Venus, drones, sky lanterns, camera artefacts or atmospheric effects. AARO’s recent reporting and NASA’s study both point to the same basic lesson: UAP research is less limited by a shortage of stories than by a shortage of high-quality, well-contextualised data. [U.S. Department of War]war.govdepartment of war releases unidentified anomalous phenomena files in historic tdepartment of war releases unidentified anomalous phenomena files in historic t(#endnote-16 “Endnote 16”)
This does not make databases useless. It makes them more like weather logs, incident reports or archive catalogues than verdict machines. They are strongest when used to ask disciplined questions: whether a wave of reports matches a satellite deployment, whether a famous case has original documentation, whether a classification changed after investigation, or whether a pattern survives after accounting for reporting bias.
Common mistakes when reading UFO report databases
One common mistake is to treat the number of reports in a region as the number of anomalies in that region. Areas with more people, clearer skies, active aviation routes, higher internet use or stronger UFO-reporting culture may produce more reports even if the underlying sky events are ordinary. Research using NUFORC has found seasonal and environmental patterns in reporting, and other work has treated large UFO datasets as evidence about human reporting behaviour as much as aerial phenomena themselves. [Nature]nature.comOpen source on nature.com.
A second mistake is to ignore duplicate pathways. A dramatic sighting may be reported to NUFORC, discussed in MUFON circles, summarised in a book, added to UFOCAT, appear in a newspaper archive and later be copied into a new database. That can make one event look like many. UFOCAT’s own explanation is unusually clear on this point: multiple records for one sighting may exist because the catalogue is designed to point towards all available sources, not to enforce a one-case-one-row statistical model. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO StudiesUFOCATUFOCAT is a catalog of published and unpublished UFO sighting reports. It often contains multiple entries for…
A third mistake is to rank databases only by size. A small official archive with original files can be more useful than a huge list of short public reports. Conversely, a large public database can be excellent for studying broad reporting patterns while being weak for proving any single case. Scale, access and credibility are separate qualities.
How to verify a case across databases
A careful reader can use UFO databases in a simple sequence.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Where UFO Reports Become Usable Evidence. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Evidence
Covers a large collection of cases, similar to the value of UFO report databases.
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
Directly linked to early government data collection efforts akin to modern databases.
UFOs
Provides authoritative insight into UFO reports and government data, matching the database/evidence theme.
Above Top Secret
Provides context for many official and semi-official reports included in databases.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.
- Start with the earliest available source. For historical US cases, that may mean Project Blue Book or National Archives material; for French cases, GEIPAN; for modern US official cases, AARO records or congressional reports. [National Archives]media.nationalarchives.gov.ukSource details in endnotes.
- Check whether the entry is a report, a case file or a later summary. A witness web-form entry and a government investigative file are not the same kind of evidence.
- Look for metadata. Time, location, direction, duration, weather, aircraft routes, satellite visibility and camera metadata often determine whether a report can be resolved.
- Search for duplicates and later explanations. The same case may appear in NUFORC, MUFON, Enigma, UFOCAT, local media and archive releases.
- Separate “unidentified” from “unusual”. A case can remain unidentified because the data are too poor, because the event was not investigated quickly, or because key context is missing. That is different from showing extraordinary performance or origin.
- Prefer databases that show their work. Classifications, original documents, investigator notes and source links are more valuable than bare summaries.
This approach avoids both automatic debunking and automatic belief. It treats databases as evidence maps: useful for navigation, but not substitutes for analysis.
The database problem at the heart of modern UAP research
The renewed official interest in UAP has not removed the central weakness of UFO catalogues: many legacy reports were collected for testimony, not science. They were not designed around calibrated instruments, standardised sensor packages, controlled baselines or reproducible observation protocols. NASA’s independent study was direct about this gap, calling for better data collection and noting that current evidence is often limited by poor calibration, lack of multiple measurements and lack of sensor metadata. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience Independent Study Team ReportUAP data are important information that should be available for researchers studying the observations. This is essential for a data- driv…
Recent scientific initiatives are trying to move beyond report catalogues towards instrumented observation. The Galileo Project, for example, has described a goal of building multimodal ground-based observatories to conduct a census of aerial phenomena and identify anomalies, using coordinated instruments rather than relying mainly on retrospective eyewitness accounts. [arXiv]arxiv.orgSource details in endnotes. A 2025 review of UAP research likewise argued that governments and scientists have investigated UAP historically in multiple countries, but that the field needs clearer access to documented experience and better scientific methods. [arXiv]arxiv.orgSource details in endnotes.
That shift does not make older databases obsolete. It changes their role. Legacy catalogues remain essential for historical research, cultural analysis, case comparison and identifying recurring reporting problems. Future scientific databases, however, will need to look less like story collections and more like structured observation systems: time-synchronised sensors, raw data preservation, transparent classification, known-object deconfliction, uncertainty ratings and audit trails.
Which databases are most worth using first
For a mainstream reader trying to understand UFO report databases and catalogues, the best starting point depends on the question.
For recent public sightings, NUFORC is usually the simplest long-running public database to browse, while Enigma offers a more modern map-and-app experience. [NUFORC]nuforc.orgOpen source on nuforc.org.
For investigated civilian cases, MUFON can be useful because it is tied to an investigator network, though readers should check how much of the investigation is publicly visible. [MUFON]mufon.comOpen source on mufon.com.
For historical case tracing, UFOCAT and Project Blue Book/National Archives records are more useful than social-media summaries because they point towards source material and archival context. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO StudiesUFOCATUFOCAT is a catalog of published and unpublished UFO sighting reports. It often contains multiple entries for… [National Archives]media.nationalarchives.gov.ukSource details in endnotes.
For official modern UAP context, AARO, ODNI reports and NASA’s UAP study material are the strongest starting points, especially for understanding what the US government says it has received, resolved, left unresolved and still lacks in data quality. [Director of National Intelligence]dni.gov4020 uap 20244020 uap 2024 [2U.S.] Department of War
For a public official case database outside the US, GEIPAN is one of the clearest examples because it sits within CNES and publishes information about its collection, analysis, investigation and archiving mission. [cnes-geipan.fr]cnes-geipan.frOpen source on cnes-geipan.fr.
The strongest habit is to use more than one database. A single entry can show that a report exists; cross-checking can show whether it has documents, duplicates, explanations, classification history and enough metadata to be taken further.
Endnotes
-
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: Science Independent Study Team Report
Link: https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report.pdfSource snippet
UAP data are important information that should be available for researchers studying the observations. This is essential for a data- driv...
-
Source: nasa.gov
Title: update nasa shares uap independent study report names director
Link: https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/update-nasa-shares-uap-independent-study-report-names-director/Source snippet
NASAUPDATE: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report14 Sept 2023 — The external study recommends that NASA use its open-source resources...
-
Source: cufos.org
Link: https://cufos.org/cufos-publications-databases/ufocat/Source snippet
Center for UFO StudiesUFOCATUFOCAT is a catalog of published and unpublished UFO sighting reports. It often contains multiple entries for...
-
Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10721628/Source snippet
This research uses data from the National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC) online. NUFORC was formed in 1974...Read more...
-
Source: nuforc.org
Title: Data Bank | NUFORC
Link: https://nuforc.org/databank/ -
Source: nature.com
Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-024-04182-z -
Source: mufon.com
Link: https://mufon.com/research/ -
Source: enigmalabs.io
Link: https://enigmalabs.io/explore -
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos -
Source: archives.gov
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/catalog/catalog-bulk-downloads/uap-bulk-download -
Source: archives.gov
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/photographs -
Source: archives.gov
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/rg-collections -
Source: media.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link: https://media.nationalarchives.gov.uk/index.php/ufo-files-national-archives/ -
Source: aaro.mil
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/ -
Source: aaro.mil
Title: UNCLASSIFIED FY23 Consolidated Annual Report on UAP Oct 25 2023 1236
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/UNCLASSIFIED-FY23_Consolidated_Annual_Report_on_UAP-Oct_25_2023_1236.pdf -
Source: war.gov
Title: department of defense releases the annual report on unidentified anomalous phen
Link: https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3964824/department-of-defense-releases-the-annual-report-on-unidentified-anomalous-phen/ -
Source: reuters.com
Title: Pentagon UFO report says most sightings ‘ordinary objects’ and phenomena
Link: https://www.reuters.com/technology/space/pentagon-ufo-report-says-most-sightings-ordinary-objects-phenomena-2024-03-08/ -
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link: https://science.nasa.gov/uap/ -
Source: cnes.fr
Link: https://cnes.fr/en/projects/geipan -
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link: https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/missions-methodes-et-resultats -
Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Link: https://skepticalinquirer.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2009/01/p47.pdf?ref=thegalacticmind.com -
Source: arxiv.org
Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18566 -
Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv The New Science of Unidentified Aerospace-Undersea Phenomena (UAP)
Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06794 -
Source: aaro.mil
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/ -
Source: aaro.mil
Title: UAP Records
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Records/ -
Source: aaro.mil
Title: AARO Historical Record Report Vol 1 2024
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/AARO_Historical_Record_Report_Vol_1_2024.pdf -
Source: aaro.mil
Title: Congressional Press Products
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Congressional-Press-Products/ -
Source: war.gov
Link: https://www.war.gov/ufo/?releaseDate=Release -
Source: war.gov
Title: Presidential Unsealing and Reporting System for UAP
Link: https://www.war.gov/UFO/ -
Source: war.gov
Title: department of war releases unidentified anomalous phenomena files in historic t
Link: https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4480582/department-of-war-releases-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-files-in-historic-t/ -
Source: nuforc.org
Link: https://nuforc.org/ -
Source: nuforc.org
Link: https://nuforc.org/ndx/?id=loc -
Source: nuforc.org
Link: https://nuforc.org/report-a-ufo/ -
Source: nuforc.org
Link: https://nuforc.org/map/ -
Source: archives.gov
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps -
Source: cufos.org
Title: classic ufo cases
Link: https://cufos.org/resources/classic-ufo-cases/ -
Source: cufos.org
Title: UFOCAT Codebook 2023
Link: https://cufos.org/PDFs/UFOCAT%20Codebook%202023.pdf -
Source: cufos.org
Title: Research Projects
Link: https://cufos.org/resources/research-projects/ -
Source: cufos.org
Link: https://cufos.org/ -
Source: cufos.org
Link: https://cufos.org/resources/ufo-catalogues/ -
Source: cufos.org
Title: Selected Articles
Link: https://cufos.org/cufos-publications-databases/articles/ -
Source: cufos.org
Title: Frequently Asked Questions
Link: https://cufos.org/resources/faqs/ -
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link: https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/sites/default/files/15_VALLEE_full.pdf -
Source: cnes-geipan.fr
Link: https://www.cnes-geipan.fr/en/node/58792 -
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024
Link: https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF -
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link: https://science.nasa.gov/uap/faqs/ -
Source: arxiv.org
Link: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.18566 -
Source: mufon.com
Link: https://mufon.com/ -
Source: nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/ufos/ -
Source: nature.com
Link: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-49527-x -
Source: newyorker.com
Title: The New Yorker The Truth Is Out There, on an App
Link: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/01/29/the-truth-is-out-there-on-an-app -
Source: dni.gov
Title: 4020 uap 2024
Link: https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/reports-publications-2024/4020-uap-2024 -
Source: enigmalabs.io
Link: https://enigmalabs.io/ -
Source: enigmalabs.io
Title: 25k sightings
Link: https://enigmalabs.io/blog/25k-sightings -
Source: play.google.com
Link: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?hl=en_GB&id=ovni_info.space.ovniobservationgb -
Source: play.google.com
Link: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?hl=en_GB&id=com.enigma.mobile -
Source: Wikipedia
Title: National UFO Reporting Center
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_UFO_Reporting_Center -
Source: Wikipedia
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GEIPAN -
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Project Blue Book
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Blue_Book -
Source: cuny.manifoldapp.org
Title: national ufo reporting center
Link: https://cuny.manifoldapp.org/read/national-ufo-reporting-center -
Source: vault.fbi.gov
Link: https://vault.fbi.gov/Project%20Blue%20Book%20%28UFO%29%20/Project%20Blue%20Book%20%28UFO%29%20Part%2001%20%28Final%29/at_download/file -
Source: dataherb.github.io
Title: nuforc ufo events
Link: https://dataherb.github.io/flora/nuforc_ufo_events/
Additional References
-
Source: cia.gov
Link: https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP81R00560R000100060001-5.pdf -
Source: youtube.com
Title: UFOs discovered in The National Archives
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTDn_GtdEzgSource snippet
GEIPAN: Behind the scenes of the organization that studies unidentified aerospace phenomena...
-
Source: youtube.com
Title: Governments Using AI To Decode Massive UFO Databases | WION Podcast
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adCsqd_-M94Source snippet
Project Blue Book: America's Obsession with UFOs...
-
Source: researchgate.net
Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368458403_Social_factors_and_UFO_reports_was_the_SARS-CoV-2_pandemic_associated_with_an_increase_in_UFO_reporting -
Source: researchgate.net
Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252518312_Time-Series_Analysis_of_a_Catalog_of_UFO_Events_Evidence_of_a_Local-Sidereal-Time_Modulation -
Source: archivesfoundation.org
Link: https://archivesfoundation.org/documents/50-years-ago-government-stops-investigating-ufos/ -
Source: instagram.com
Link: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYYspFPFK5I/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/TheFrenchHistoryPodcast/posts/a-drawing-from-the-files-at-the-french-ufo-department/1337099231754482/ -
Source: instagram.com
Link: https://www.instagram.com/p/DYVjTnNjis5/ -
Source: apnews.com
Link: https://apnews.com/article/5638be273b753253713a478546849e46
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
More on this topic 15
- AARO Why AARO Cases Remain Unresolved
- Archives Finding Original UFO Records in Archives
- Blue Book What Project Blue Book Records Still Reveal
- Clusters Why UFO Sightings Cluster on the Map
- Duplicates How One UFO Sighting Becomes Many Records
- Enigma Can a UFO App Fix Old Data Problems?
- GEIPAN How France Classifies Public UAP Cases
- Misidentifications Why Ordinary Objects Fill UFO Databases
- +7 more in sidebar